{"id":1965,"date":"2025-01-21T15:40:52","date_gmt":"2025-01-21T15:40:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/?p=1965"},"modified":"2025-01-21T15:40:52","modified_gmt":"2025-01-21T15:40:52","slug":"repeated-wood-dust-failures-lands-company-with-fine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/?p=1965","title":{"rendered":"Repeated wood dust failures lands company with fine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An Essex-based company that makes windows and doors has been hit with a \u00a34,000 fine after repeatedly failing to protect its workers from exposure to wood dust.<\/p>\n<p>Timbercraft Windows &amp; Doors Limited, which also manufactures wooden conservatories, was visited by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on three occasions over a 12-year period.<\/p>\n<p>Those visits, to the company\u2019s workshop on Severalls Industrial Park in Colchester, identified large build-ups of wood dust around machinery as well as other health and safety breaches. These included workers not being provided with suitable respiratory protective equipment (RPE).<\/p>\n<p>        The amount of wood dust on the premises put workers at risk<\/p>\n<p>Breathing in wood dust excessively can cause asthma and nasal cancer. Guidance on working in the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hse.gov.uk\/woodworking\/wooddust.htm?utm_source=press.hse.gov.uk&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=prosecution-push\">woodworking industry<\/a> is available and an\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/workright.campaign.gov.uk\/campaigns\/wood-dust\/?utm_source=press-release&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=woodworking-dust-2023&amp;utm_term=workright&amp;utm_content=homepage\">inspection-led campaign to protect workers<\/a> continues.<\/p>\n<p>A subsequent HSE investigation found the company failed to adequately control and prevent its employee\u2019s exposure to wood dust in the following ways:<\/p>\n<p>inadequate local exhaust ventilation (LEV) and a failure to have its LEV thoroughly examined and tested within the preceding 14 months;<br \/>\nfailure to have employees face fit tested for their RPE;<br \/>\ncommon dry sweeping of wood dust;<br \/>\nusing compressed air lines for clearing of wood dust from machines;<br \/>\nusing incorrect L class vacuums; and<br \/>\nfailure to have employees who were exposed to wood dust under health surveillance.<\/p>\n<p>        HSE inspectors visited Timbercraft Windows &amp; Doors Limited three times over 12 years<\/p>\n<p>For each of failures above the solutions are widely known in the woodworking industry:<\/p>\n<p>Health surveillance should be undertaken for employees exposed to wood dust; a system of on-going health checks to detect ill-health effects such as occupational asthma at an early stage.<br \/>\nLEV in woodworking should be subject to a thorough examination and test by a competent person, no less frequent than every 14 months. It is a detailed and systematic examination sufficient to make sure the LEV can continue to perform as intended by design and will contribute to the adequate control of exposure.<br \/>\nAdequate LEV will be dependent upon the process, however guidance sheets for control of wood dust at woodworking machines are available for free from the HSE website.<br \/>\nFace fit testing is required for tight fitting RPE to ensure that it fits the wearers face and does not leak, as this would increase the wearers exposure.<br \/>\nWood dust should be cleared on a regular basis using a minimum of an M class vacuum. Dry sweeping and use of compressed air lines should not be used for clearing of wood dust as they create plumes of dust that can then be inhaled once again.<\/p>\n<p>Following the December 2022 inspection, three improvement notices were served relating to control of wood dust. A further improvement notice was served relating to arrangements for monitoring, guarding and other protection devices on machinery.<\/p>\n<p>Each visit by HSE inspectors during the past 12 years had resulted in improvement notices being issued, along with other action taken. However, despite this, the company still failed to act, including to provide its workers with suitable RPE.<\/p>\n<p>        Despite repeated visits from HSE the company failed to protect its own workers<\/p>\n<p>Timbercraft Windows &amp; Doors Limited, of Crowborough East Sussex, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 9(2), 11(1) and 7(1) of Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002.<\/p>\n<p>The company was fined \u00a34,000 and was ordered to pay \u00a32,792 costs at a hearing at Colchester Magistrates Court on the 16 of January 2025.<\/p>\n<p>HSE inspector Tom McQuade said: \u201cJust seeing the piles of wood dust lying around gave us an indication of how much workers would have been exposed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe risks from exposure to wood dust are well known and exposure can cause irreparable harm.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe fine imposed should highlight to employers in the woodworking industry that the courts and HSE, take failure to control exposure to harmful substances, such as wood dust, extremely seriously.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAppropriate controls are well documented, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hse.gov.uk\/woodworking\/wooddust.htm?utm_source=press.hse.gov.uk&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=prosecution-push\">guidance is provided free of charge<\/a> on the HSE website.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBusinesses need to protect their employee\u2019s respiratory health. And if they don\u2019t, we will not hesitate to take appropriate action.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This HSE prosecution was brought by enforcement lawyer Arfaq Nabi and paralegal officer Helen Hugo.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>Further information:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hse.gov.uk\/?utm_source=press.hse.gov.uk&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=notes-to-editors\">The Health and Safety Executive<\/a>\u00a0(HSE) is Britain\u2019s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.<br \/>\nMore information about the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/?utm_source=press.hse.gov.uk&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=notes-to-editors\">legislation<\/a>\u00a0referred to in this case is available.<br \/>\nFurther details on the latest\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/press.hse.gov.uk\/?utm_source=press.hse.gov.uk&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=notes-to-editors\">HSE news releases<\/a>\u00a0is available.<br \/>\nHSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed. Relevant sentencing guidelines must be followed unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.\u00a0 The sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences in England and Wales can be found\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk\/sentencing-and-the-council\/about-sentencing-guidelines\/about-published-guidelines\/health-and-safety-offences-corporate-manslaughter-and-food-safety-and-hygiene-offences\/\">here<\/a>\u00a0and for those in Scotland\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk\/sentencing-information\/how-do-courts-decide-a-sentence\">here<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An Essex-based company that makes windows and doors has been hit with a \u00a34,000 fine after repeatedly failing to protect its workers from exposure to wood dust. Timbercraft Windows &amp; Doors Limited, which also manufactures wooden conservatories, was visited by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on three occasions over a 12-year period. Those visits,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1965"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1965"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1965\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.safetyphoto.co.uk\/safety_news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}